Bishop's Statement
|
A statement by The Rt. Rev. Barry Beisner,
Bishop of Northern California
I have
waited until very late in the consent process to finalize my decision. In part this is because it has been a complex
and challenging matter, with many questions –procedural, canonical, theological,
ecclesiastical, etc.— involved, and with many layers to each question.
In addition, there has been considerable confusion as to just what the
facts are; Kevin’s actual views and actions weighed heavily in the decision before
me. And so I have utilized all of the
time available to me to complete this decision, reading the relevant documents, consulting with
fellow bishops, and discussing the matter with our Standing Committee –who, after our
discussion on April 17, voted to withhold consent. I
sympathized with that decision but took additional time to speak with Kevin
personally, to read some further material from him that he did not publish
until the following week. Throughout
this time, my constant prayer has been for right discernment for all involved. I have great
respect for Kevin, and great regard for the Diocese of Northern Michigan. It saddens me greatly, therefore, to tell you
that I am unable to consent to this election.
As I have said, many issues have been raised; I will name only one:
Kevin’s
revision of our liturgy of Holy Baptism. It is of
course true that ours is a living tradition, and that as the Church’s context
changes, its liturgy will also change.
The Church must have zones of innovation for the responsible exploration of such change. But these must be established within
canonically acceptable boundaries, and they must be conducted in a way which is
accountable to the whole church. I have
concluded that the changes Kevin made, and the manner in which he made them,
however much designed and intended to be responsible and accountable, quite
simply exceeded the authority of any bishop and diocese, let alone rector and
parish. It is not that the liturgy of
Baptism cannot be changed, and indeed might not one day be changed; my concern
is that this liturgy is so very essential to our identity and to our understanding
of our mission that any revision can only be undertaken after very careful
consideration by all of us, authorized only by the whole of our church through
legitimate processes. Not only has that
not been done in this instance; I am not confident that, for all his very
immense talents and deep commitment to serve this church, Kevin will refrain
from future unauthorized experimentation.
In my judgment, that lack of assurance is critical. Thinking of
Kevin, and of the people of the Diocese Northern Michigan, I am deeply saddened
not to be able to give my consent to this election. I pray God’s healing and help for them, and
for us all. |
